Just thought I'd let everyone know that in my humble opinion and vast testing of exactly two models, the Starboard Evo 92 of approx 2005 vintage is way stronger than the JP Real World Wave 91 of approx 2007 vintage.
The Evo was my first wave board and lasted me from 25/09/2005 to about 25/08/2008... a good 3 years during which I tore my symphysus pubis (details available to those who are interested), had it (not that, the Evo) washed over the rocks at Baggies (thanks to Alistair for the board rescue) tried my first flat-water forwards and generally did some very big, very uncontrolled, very flat landed jumps on it.
Around then it creased in the centre and I got Arno to repair it.
The RWW91 I took care of with kid gloves, tried a few forwards, crashed a few back/pushloops and tried to ride down the line. But it has basically lasted half the time of the Evo despite my learning to land better and being much more careful with it.
Two weeks ago in an out of control palm beach session I landed a few jumps badly and smashed the deck and (according to Arno) bent the rocker line.
[
www.stormchasers.org.za]
Of course you can never compare exactly and be sure that both boards underwent the same treatment but it really looks as though the Evo was more durable. I don't know if this is a brand thing or down to the particular construction of the models (FWS for the JP and DRAM on the Evo I think).
Let's see what the blurb has to say... according to JP's website:
Full wood sandwich has a double sandwich, glass bridge, wood on the deck, full technora-kevlar standing area below and above the wood. Well, that stuff broke pretty darned easily.
Nothing specifically about strength or durability.
From Starboard:
"The Starboard "Dur-X" construction standard is arguably the most durable one in the world: The warranty rates estimated as the lowest in the industry"
So I guess they did say it and they were right... at least in comparison to the JP in question.
What is the conclusion?
Well, obviously this is not a controlled or repeatable, reliable test of durability... just an account of my personal experience. But I personally will draw the following conclusions:
1. I will choose starboard over JP for waveboards... primarily for the durability difference I have experienced.
2. If possible, I will look out for products that at least claim to be durable or have durability as one of their selling points and I'll definitely rate this over lightness or performance.
My message to the industry- all boards break if you hammer them enough, esp if you are a 94kg heavyweightlike myself... but there is a lot to be said in my particular section of the market for an increase in durability even if it comes at the cost of a small performance penalty. Like Chris G before me, I'm mostly a weekend sailor and at such a rate, I expect a waveboard to last me 3 years, like the Evo... not 1.5 years like the JP.